What is the Definition of Leadership? | Credit Management

What is leadership? Who is the leader? How to Become a Leader? Is leadership innate or developed? Are the manager and the leader the same person? Is it possible to change a person’s leadership type? Under these headings What is the Definition of Leadership? Let’s try to answer the question.

These and similar questions have preoccupied sociologists for many years, and efforts to define leadership or describe a leader have been diverse. In the past, some observers focused on personality traits and defined leadership within the framework of these personality traits. On the other hand, some who accept the complexity of the social environment have defended the idea that the environment creates the leader by taking into account many social variables. These are in another article. The Importance of Personal and Behavioral Traits in a Leader form is examined.

Before addressing leadership approaches, it would be useful to include the definition of leadership and some other concepts and views about leadership:

Various definitions of leadership can be given. For example “leadership behaviorPeople who are in » can be called leaders, on the other hand, there are also those who define leadership as “the sum of various qualities”. A leader can be thought of as a “director and follower”. A classic definition is as follows: “The leader is the person who determines the goals of the group to which he belongs and can direct the group most effectively in the realization of these goals.”

What is the Definition of Leadership?

When it comes to leadership, it comes to mind “informal leader” and “executiveThere are also concepts such as ». It is known that individuals operating within the official organization may also belong to informal or informal groups.

For example, a group of bank managers who meet among themselves from time to time. The most influential and influential member of these groups, which have a certain status system, is called the “informal leader” or “natural leader”. Sometimes a natural leader can be born in formal groups as well. In this case, both the “manager” and the “manager”natural leaderA group table with » is created.

The manager comes to work by appointment, he is a leader to the extent that he can be effective on the employees. Of course, although he has some advantages over the leader, he may encounter some difficulties during his work.

The natural leader is recognized by the members with the necessary authority to achieve group goals. The manager, on the other hand, has to perform the role of leader without taking any authority from the group. However, the authority of the manager is determined and supported by the official organization and the subordinates have to submit to this authority. However, it is also unthinkable that occupying a particular position can provide the manager with the necessary authority sufficiently.

natural leader plays a large role in setting group goals; it may even try to change these aims. The manager, on the other hand, is responsible for directing the work to the determined goals rather than bringing specific goals. In this respect, leadership has a broader quality than management.

On the other hand, in some aspects, management is more comprehensive than leadership. While the leader is trying to achieve the group goals, he has to rely on and benefit from other qualities in the group with his own characteristics. Required if administrator Administration They can own their expenses through training and often receive this training, on the other hand, they can get help by consulting experts.

The leader is only accountable to the group that has given him authority. The manager is a person who has appointed himself to this position. Administration mechanism as well as the continuation of its task. is responsible to the group that will provide it. Therefore, the manager has the delicate position of reconciling the wishes of superiors and subordinates, that is, two separate groups, often in conflict with each other.

Although explanations and views on leadership and management are presented as two separate persons and different functions, leadership and management can unite in the same person; rather, it is a prerequisite for successful management. The manager is successful to the extent that he can gather his leadership qualities on him. Ideally, the leader and the manager should be the same person. Managers who can achieve this have a high level of cooperation in their work groups and are oriented towards the goals of the organization.

Leave a Comment